Piśmiennictwo do artykułu „Biokompatybilność w noszeniu i pielęgnacji soczewek kontaktowych: jak ją mierzymy i co oznacza?” Paula Karpeckiego z numeru 1/2012

włącz .

Piśmiennictwo do artykułu „Biokompatybilność w noszeniu i pielęgnacji soczewek kontaktowych: jak ją mierzymy i co oznacza?” Paula Karpeckiego z numeru 1/2012

1. Garofalo RJ, Dassanayake N, et al. Corneal staining and subjective symptoms with multipurpose solutions as a function of time. Eye Contact Lens 2005;31(4): 166–174
2. Amos C, Young G, Lakkis C. Biocompatibility of contact lens care systems used with silicone hydrogel lenses. Poster presented at: the 30th Annual Meeting of the British Contact Lens Association; 2006; Birmingham, UK
3. Andrasko G and Ryen K. Corneal staining and comfort observed with traditional and silicone hydrogel lenses and multipurpose solution combinations. Optometry 2008;79(8): 444–454
4. Carnt N, Evans V, et al. IER Matrix Update: Adding Another Silicone Hydrogel. Contact Lens Spectrum 2008;23(3): 40–43
5. Carnt N, Jalbert I, et al. Solution toxicity in soft contact lens daily wear is associated with corneal inflammation. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84(4): 309–315
6. Bakkar M, Maldonado-Codina C, et al.  Development of an in vitro model of solution induced corneal staining (SICS). Presented at the American Association of Optometry. 2010: Abstract 100959
7. Bright FV, Maziarz P, et al. Poster presented at: The 6th Biennial Scientific Symposium of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists Education & Research Foundation; September 23–25, 2010; Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
8. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Edu Psychol Meas 1960;20(1):37–46
9. Cohen J. Weighed kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 1968;70(4):213–220
10. Arita R, Itoh K, et al. Contact lens wear is associated with decrease of meibomian glands.  Ophthalmology 2009;116(3):379–384


11. Grus FH, Kramann C, et al. Effects of multipurpose contact lens solutions on the protein composition of the tear film. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2005;28(3):103–112.
12. Itoh R, Yokoi N, Kinoshita S. Tear film instability induced by rigid contact lenses. Cornea, 1999;18(4):440–443.
13. McNamara NA, Polse KA, et al. Tear mixing under a soft contact lens: effects of lens diameter. Am J Ophthalmol, 1999;127(6):659–665.
14. Schurmans LR, Boets EP, van Best JA. Corneal epithelial permeability during extended wear of disposable contact lenses versus daily wear of soft contact lenses. Br J Ophthalmol, 1995;79(4):350–353.
15. Thai L, Doane MG, Tomlinson A. Effect of different soft contact lens materials on the tear film. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2002;43:E-abstract 3083
16. Bumgardner JD, et al. (2007). In G. L. Bowlin & G. Wnek (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering (pp 1–10). New York: Mercel Dekker, Inc.
17. Basu B, Nath S. (2009). Advanced Biomaterials: Fundamentals, Processing, and Applications (pp 4–18). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
18. Dracopoulos A, Dixon DG, et al. In vitro assessment of medical device toxicity: interactions of benzalkonium chloride with silicone-containing and p-hema-containing hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens, 2007;33(1):26–37
19. Hough DA. Quantifying the surface characteristics of rigid gas permeable lenses. Trans BCLA Conference, Birmingham, 1989:27-28.
20. Aakre BM, Ystenaes AE, et al. A 6-month follow-up of successful refits from daily disposable soft contact lenses to continuous wear of high-Dk silicone-hydrogel lenses. Ophthal Physiol Optics, 2004;24(2):130-141.
21. Barrett RP, Mowery–McKee M, Hazlett LD. Punctate fluorescein corneal staining observed using polyhexamethylene biguanide containing disinfecting solution not indicative of corneal surface damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2005;46:E-Abstract 5732.
22. Bergmanson JP and Barbeito R. Clinical assessment of ocular response to a multipurpose contact lens care solution. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 1995;15(6):535-544. 
23. Bergmanson JP and Ross RN. A masked quantitative cytologic study of the safety of a multipurpose contact lens solution applied to the in vivo rabbit eye. J Am Optom Assoc, 1993;64(5):308-314. 
24. Bickel PW and Barr JT. Rigid gas-permeable contact lenses in high and low humidity. J Am Optom Assoc, 1997;68(9):574-578.
25. Boets EP, Kerkmeer MJ, van Best JA. Contact lens care solutions and corneal epithelial barrier function: a fluorophotometric study. Ophthalmic Res, 1994;26(3):129-136.
26. Brennan NA, Coles ML, et al. A 12-month prospective clinical trial of comfilcon A silicone-hydrogel contact lenses worn on a 30-day continuous wear basis. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2007;30(2):108-118. 
27. Cairns G, Bateman KM, et al.  The association of contact lens thickness to the occurrence of SEALs. Presented at: the American Academy of Optometry. 2008.
28. Chalmers RL, Dillehay S, et al. Impact of previous extended and daily wear schedules on signs and symptoms with high Dk lotrafilcon A lenses. Optom Vis Sci, 2005;82(6):549-554.
29. Cho P, Lui T, Kee C. Soft contact lens care systems and corneal staining in Hong Kong-Chinese. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 1998;21(2):47-53.
30. Dassanayake NL, Garofalo R, et al.  Correlating biocide uptake and release profiles with corneal staining and subjective symptoms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2005;46:E-Abstract 915.
31. Davis R, Eiden SB, Hankin B. Comparing two-week toric contact lenses. Contact Lens Spectrum,  2008;23(2):39-43.
32. Dillehay SM and Miller MB. Performance of lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel contact lenses in experienced low-Dk/t daily lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens, 2007;33(6 Pt 1):272-277. 
33. Doughty MJ, Aakre BM, et al. Short-term adaptation of the human corneal endothelium to continuous wear of silicone hydrogel (lotrafilcon A) contact lenses after daily hydrogel lens wear. Optom Vis Sci, 2005;82(6):473-480.
34. Dumbleton K, Keir N, et al. Objective and subjective responses in patients refitted to daily-wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci, 2006;83(10):758-768.
35. Fahmy M, Long B, et al. Comfort-enhanced daily disposable contact lens reduces symptoms among weekly/monthly wear patients. Eye Contact Lens, 2010;36(4):215-219.
36. Fisher K, Comstock T. Clinical comparison of opaque tint soft contact lenses. Presented at: the American Academy of Optometry Conference. 1995:143.
37. Gleason W, Tanaka H, et al. A 1-year prospective clinical trial of Menicon Z (tisilfocon A) rigid gas-permeable contact lens worn on a 30-day continuous wear schedule. Eye Contact Lens, 2003;29(1):2-9.
38. Guillon M and Maissa C. Clinical acceptance of two multipurpose solutions: MPS containing HPMC versus citrate-based MPS without rubbing. CLAO J, 2002;28(4):186-191.
39. Guillon M and Maissa C. The effect of optimising silicone hydrogels key physical properties on extended wear clinical performance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2006;47:E-abstract 2382.
40. Lakkis C and Vincent S. Clinical investigation of asmofilcon A silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci, 2009;86(4):350-356.
41. Lehmann DM, Cavet ME, Richardson ME. Nonclinical safety evaluation of boric acid and a novel borate-buffered contact lens multi-purpose solution, Biotrue™ multi-purpose solution. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2010;33(Suppl 1):S24-S32.
42. Lemp MA, Caffery B, et al. Omafilcon A (Proclear) soft contact lenses in a dry eye population. CLAO J, 1999;25(1):40-47.
43. Li L, Moody K, et al. Contact lenses in pediatrics study in Singapore. Eye Contact Lens, 2009;35(4):188-195.
44. Lipener C; Contact Lens Advisory in Scientific Studies (CLASS) group. A randomized clinical comparison of OPTI-FREE EXPRESS and ReNu MultiPLUS multipurpose lens care solutions. Adv Ther, 2009;26(4):435-446. 
45. Long B, Schweizer H, et al. Expanding your use of silicone hydrogel contact lenses: using lotrafilcon A for daily wear. Eye Contact Lens, 2009;35(2):59-64.
46. Martin R, Sanchez I, et al. Differences in the daily symptoms associated with the silicone hydrogel contact lens wear. Eye Contact Lens, 2010;36(1):49-53.
47. Merchea MM, Reindel W, et al. Inflammatory mediators associated with transient, contact lens solution-induced corneal staining. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2008;49:E-abstract 4851.
48. Miller MB and Dillehay SM. Multipurpose solution use with silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Contact Lens Spectrum, 2007;22(5):33-34,36,38.
49. Morgan P, Chamberlain P, et al. A daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lens in neophyte wearers. Presented at: the American Academy of Optometry. 2009:E-abstract 95814.
50. Mowrey-McKee MF, Amos C, et al. AQuifyTM MPS: novel multifunctional contact lens care system. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2004;45:E-abstract 1540.
51. Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K. Daily disposable vs. disposable extended wear: A contact lens clinical trial. Optom Vis Sci, 2000;77(12):637-647.
52. Nichols JJ. Deposition rates and lens care influence on galyfilcon A silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci, 2006;83(10):751-757.
53. Pritchard N, Young G, et al. Subjective and objective measures of corneal staining related to multipurpose care systems. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2003;26(1):3-9.
54. Riley C, Chalmers RL, Pence N. The impact of lens choice in the relief of contact lens related symptoms and ocular surface findings. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2005;28(1):13-19.
55. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Barrado-Navascués E, et al. Compatibility of two new silicone hydrogel contact lenses with three soft contact lens multipurpose solutions. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2008;28(4):373-381.
56. Santodomingo-Rubido J. The comparative clinical performance of a new polyhexamethylene biguanide- vs a polyquad-based contact lens care regime with two silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2007;27(2):168-173.
57. Sorbara L, Peterson R, et al. Multipurpose disinfecting solutions and their interactions with a silicone hydrogel lens. Eye Contact Lens, 2009;35(2):92-97.
58. Subbaraman LN, Woods J, et al. Protein deposition on a lathe-cut silicone hydrogel contact lens material. Optom Vis Sci, 2009;86(3):244-250.
59. Szczotka-Flynn LB and Patel S. Menicon Z rigid gas permeable lenses for keratoconus and irregular corneas: A retrospective case series. Eye Contact Lens, 2008;34(5):254-260.
60. Townsend W, Katims S, Rosen JS. Investigating a new-generation multipurpose solution. Contact Lens Spectrum, 2005;20(12).
61. Walline JJ, Long S, Zadnik K. Daily disposable contact lens wear in myopic children. Optom Vis Sci, 2004;81(4):255-259.
62. Wang Q, Guerra J, et al. The effect of multipurpose solutions on human cornea cell under in vivo confocal microscope. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2004;45:E-Abstract 1533.
63. Young G, Bowers R, et al. Six month clinical evaluation of a biomimetic hydrogel contact lens. CLAO J, 1997;23(4):226-236.
64. Emch AJ, Nichols JJ. Proteins Identified From Care Solution Extractions of Silicone Hydrogels. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(2):E123-E131.
65. Schachet J, Zigler LG, et al. Clinical assessment of a new multi-purpose disinfecting solution in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Presented at American Academy of Optometry Conference, Denver, CO. 2006.
66. Carnt NA, Evans VE, et al. Contact lens-related adverse events and the silicone hydrogel lenses and daily wear care system used. Arch Ophthalmol, 2009;127(12):1616-1623.
67. Kislan TP and Hom MM. Corneal infiltrates with multipurpose solutions and contact lens combinations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2010;51:E-abstract 3424.
68. Diec J, Carnt N, Naduvilath TJ. Performance of Polyquad, PHMB and peroxide solutions with silicone hydrogel lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2009;50:E-Abstract 5633.
69. Kiernan D, Chin E, et al. Multiple drug-resistant Alcaligenes xylosoxidans keratitis in a sanitation worker. Eye Contact Lens, 2009;35(4):212-214. 
70. Reeder R. Trends associated with corneal infiltrative events in soft lens wearers. Presented at the 2011 Global Specialty Lens Symposium; January 2011; Las Vegas.
71. Reindel B, Cairns G, Bateman K. Determining relationships between various safety parameters and lens care solutions using meta-analysis. Poster presented at: the 33rd British Contact Lens Association Clinical Conference and Exhibition; May 29, 2009.
72. Sacco A. Silicone hydrogel contact lenses, lens care and sterile infiltrates: is there a connection? Poster presented at: the Annual Global Specialty Lens Symposium; January 27-30, 2011; Las Vegas, NV.
73. Dundas M, Walker A, Woods RL. Clinical grading of corneal staining of non-contact lens wearers. Ophthal Physiol Optics, 2001;21(1):30-35.
74. Caffery BE and Josephson JE. Corneal staining after sequential instillations of fluorescein over 30 days. Optom Vis Sci, 1991;68(6):467-469.
75. Korb DR and Herman JP. Corneal staining subsequent to sequential fluorescein instillations. J Am Optom Assoc, 1979;50(3):361-367.
76. Korb DR and Korb JM. Corneal staining prior to contact lens wearing. J Am Optom Assoc, 1970;41(3):228-232.
77. Peral A, Carracedo G, et al. Characterization of ocular surface symptoms and signs of a university population in Spain. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2005;46:E-abstract 4456.
78. Schwallie JD, Mckenney CD, et al. Corneal staining patterns in normal non-contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci, 1997;74(2):92-98.
79. Brautaset RL, Nilsson M, et al. Corneal and conjunctival epithelial staining in hydrogel contact lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens, 2008;34(6):312-316.
80. Begley CG, Barr JT, et al. Characteristics of corneal staining in hydrogel contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci, 1996;73(3):193-200.
81. Nichols KK, Mitchell GL, et al. Corneal staining in hydrogel lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci, 2002;79(1):20-30.
82. Davies IP and Veys J. The use of fluorescein in contact lens aftercare. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2009;32(4):187-189. 
83. O'Donnell C, Efron N, Boulton AJ. A prospective study of contact lens wear in diabetes mellitus. Ophthal Physiol Optics, 2001;21(2):127-138.
84. Edrington T, Gundel RE, et al; The CLEK Study Group. Variables affecting rigid contact lens comfort in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. Optom Vis Sci, 2004;81(3):182-188.
85. Erdurmus M, Yildiz EH, et al. Contact lens related quality of life in patients with keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens, 2009;35(3):123-127.
86. Weed KH, Macewen CJ, McGhee CN. The Dundee University Scottish Keratoconus Study II: a prospective study of optical and surgical correction. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2007;27(6):561-567.
87. Ramos-Remus C, Suarez-Almazor M, Russell AS. Low tear production in patients with diabetes mellitus is not due to Sjögren’s syndrome. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 1994;12(4):375-380. 
88. Dogru M, Katakami C, Inoue M. Tear function and ocular surface changes in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Ophthalmology, 2001;108(3):586-592.
89. Dogru M, Karakaya H, et al. Tear function and ocular surface changes in keratoconus. Ophthalmology, 2003;110(6):1110-1118.
90. Chalmers RL, Keay L, et al.  Risk factors for contact lens complications in US clinical practices. Optom Vis Sci, 2010;87(10):725-735.
91. Lakkis C, Goldenberg SA, Woods CA. Investigation of the performance of the Menifocal Z gas-permeable bifocal contact lens during continuous wear. Optom Vis Sci, 2005;82(12):1022-1029.
92. Szczotka-Flynn L, Lass JH, et al.  Risk factors for corneal infiltrative events during continuous wear of silicone hydrogel contact lenses.  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2010;51(11):5421-5430.
93. Fonn D, Gauthier CA, Pritchard N. Patient preferences and comparative ocular responses to rigid and soft contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci, 1995;72(12):857-863.
94. Kuo J, Albright M, Szczotka-Flynn L. Is there an association between corneal staining and other clinical slit lamp variables during 30 day soft lens continuous wear? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2008;49:E-Abstract 4832.
95. Efron N, Dumbleton K, et al. Clinical evaluation of microfenestrated contact lenses. Presented at: the American Academy of Optometry Conference. 1993:43.
96. Fletcher EL and Brennan NA. The effect of solution tonicity on the eye. Clin Exp Optom, 1993;76:17-21.
97. Michaud L, Beaulieu M, Gravel K. Clinical performance of senofilcon A lenses compared with omafilcon A to reduce induced ocular dryness. Presented at: the American Academy of Optometry. 2009:E-Abstract 95570.
98. Paugh JR, Brennan NA, Efron N. Ocular response to hydrogen peroxide. Am J Optom Physiol Optics, 1988;65(2):91-98.
99. Du Toit R, Papas E, et al. Ocular surface physiology and ocular symptoms in younger versus older, continuous, silicone hydrogel lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2002;43:E-abstract 3091.
100. Maldonado-Codina C and Efron N. Impact of manufacturing technology and material composition on the clinical performance of hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci, 2004;81(6):442-454.
101. Du Toit R, Situ P, et al. The effects of six months of contact lens wear on the tear film, ocular surfaces, and symptoms of presbyopes. Optom Vis Sci, 2001;78(6):455-462.
102. Lipson MJ, Musch DC. Synergeyes versus soft toric lenses: vision-related quality of life. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(7):593-597.
103. Maldonado-Codina C, Morgan PB, et al. Comparative clinical performance of rigid versus soft hyper Dk contact lenses used for continuous wear. Optom Vis Sci, 2005;82(6):536-548. 
104. Orsborn GN and Zantos SG. Corneal desiccation staining with thin high water content contact lenses. CLAO J, 1988;14(2):81-85.
105. Stahl U, Willcox MD, et al. Influence of tear film and contact lens osmolality on ocular comfort in contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci, 2009;86(7):857-867.
106. van der Worp E, de Brabander J, Swarbrick HA, Hendrikse F. Evaluation of signs and symptoms in 3- and 9-o'clock staining. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(3):260-265.
107. Pult H, Murphy PJ, Purslow C. A novel method to predict the dry eye symptoms in new contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(9):E1042-E1050.
108. Pult H, Purslow C, Berry M, Murphy PJ. Clinical tests for successful contact lens wear: relationship and predictive potential. Optom Vis Sci, 2008;85(10):E924-E929.
109. Szczotka-Flynn L, Debanne SM, et al. Predictive factors for corneal infiltrates with continuous wear of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Arch Ophthalmol, 2007;125(4):488-492.
110. Young G and Port M. Rigid gas-permeable extended wear: A comparative clinical study. Optom Vis Sci, 1992;69(3):213-226.
111. Schnider CM, Terry RL, Holden BA. Effect of patient and lens performance characteristics on peripheral corneal desiccation. J Am Optom Assoc, 1996;67(3):144-150.
112. Walker J, Young G, et al. Multi-centre evaluation of two daily disposable contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2007;30(2):125-133. 
113. Truong TN, Graham AD, et al. Subjective ratings of comfort and dryness vs. clinical evaluation of lens performance and ocular response to silicone hydrogel lenses: evidence from a multi-study database.  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2008;49:E-abstract 4833.
114. Lundgrin EL, Truong TN, et al. Clinical assessment vs. subjective experience of dry eye in soft contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2008;49:E-abstract 4831.
115. Carnt NA, Sweeney DF, et al. Factors associated with unusual cases of acute infiltrative keratitis in silicone hydrogel extended wear. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2002;43:E-abstract 3111.
116. Carnt NA, Keay L, et al. Risk factors associated with corneal inflammation in soft contact lens daily wear. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2007;48:E-Abstract 4326.
117. Willcox M. FDA Ophthalmic Devices Panel Meeting. 2008. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/AC/08/slides/2008-4363oph1-08-WILLCOX.pdf. Accessed March 18, 2011.
118. Zigler L, Cedrone R, et al. Clinical evaluation of silicone hydrogel lens wear with a new multipurpose disinfection care product. Eye Contact Lens, 2007;33(5):236-243.
119. Duench S, Simpson T, et al. Corneal staining is not correlated with limbal or bulbar redness in subjects using daily wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2006;47:E-Abstract 87.
120. Maldonado-Codina C, Morgan PB, et al. Short-term physiologic response in neophyte subjects fitted with hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci, 2004;81(12):911-921.
121. Michaud L and Giasson CJ. Overwear of contact lenses: increased severity of clinical signs as a function of protein adsorption. Optom Vis Sci, 2002;79(3):184-192.
122. Young G, Keir N, et al. Clinical evaluation of long-term users of two contact lens care preservative systems. Eye Contact Lens, 2009;35(2):50-58.
123. Sweeney DF. Are inflammatory events a marker for increased risk of MK? Presented at: The 32nd Annual Meeting of the British Contact Lens Association; May 29-June 1, 2008; Birmingham, UK.
124. Jones L, MacDougall N, Sorbara LG. Asymptomatic corneal staining associated with the use of balafilcon silicone-hydrogel contact lenses disinfected with a polyaminopropyl biguanide-preserved care regimen. Optom Vis Sci, 2002;79(12):753-761.
125. Keir NJ, Situ P, et al. Clinical performance of alexidine-based and polyquad-based multipurpose solutions when used with daily wear etafilcon lenses. Presented at: the 84th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Optometry; December 7-10, 2006; Denver, CO.
126. Paugh JR, Marsden HJ, et al. A pre-application drop containing carboxymethylcellulose can reduce multipurpose solution-induced corneal staining. Optom Vis Sci, 2007;84(1):65-71.
127. Riley C, Young G, Chalmers R. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs, and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (senofilcon a). Eye Contact Lens, 2006;32(6):281-286.
128. Situ P, Simpson TL, Fonn D. Clinical measures do not discriminate symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1999;40:E-Abstract 4795.
129. Willcox MD, Phillips B, et al. Interactions of lens care with silicone hydrogel lenses and effect on comfort. Optom Vis Sci, 2010;87(11):839-846.
130. Jones LW, Keir N, et al. The impact of post-insertion time on corneal staining and comfort with group II hydrogel materials disinfected with various lens care regimens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2005;46: E-Abstract 917. 
131 Tilia D, Weng R, et al. Evaluation of solution induced corneal staining impact on comfort during short term contact lens wear. Presented at: the 87th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Optometry; November 11-14, 2009; Orlando, FL.
132. Varikooty J, Situ P, et al. Clinical performance of alexidine-based and polyquad-based multipurpose solutions when used with daily wear balafilcon lenses. Presented at: the 83rd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Optometry; December 8–11, 2005; San Diego, CA.
133. Lebow KA and Schachet JL. Differences in clinical performance of multi-purpose solutions with a silicone hydrogel lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2006;47:E-abstract 99.
134. Diec J, Carnt N, et al. Patient and lens characteristics associated with solution induced corneal staining. Presented at:  the 88th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Optometry; November 17-20, 2010; San Francisco, CA.
135. Young G, Canavan K, et al. Pre-disposing factors for solution induced corneal staining (SICS). Presented at:  the 88th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Optometry; November 17-20, 2010; San Francisco, CA.
136. Situ P, Simpson TL, et al. Effects of silicone hydrogel contact lens wear on ocular surface sensitivity to tactile, pneumatic mechanical and chemical stimulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2010;51(12):6111-6117.
137. Corbin GS, Bennett L, et al. A multicenter investigation of OPTI-FREE RepleniSH multi-purpose disinfecting solution impact on soft contact lens patient comfort. Clin Ophthalmol, 2010;4:47-57.
138. Epstein AB. Contact lens care products effect on corneal sensitivity and patient comfort. Eye Contact Lens, 2006;32(3):128-132.
139. Lebow KA and Schachet JL. Evaluation of corneal staining and patient preference with use of three multi-purpose solutions and two brands of soft contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens, 2003;29(4):213-220.
140. Sindt CW, Chu D, et al. A multi-site comparison of acute corneal staining associated with a silicone hydrogel lens and two marketed multi-purpose solutions. Presented at: the American Academy of Optometry Conference; Tampa, FL; 2007.
141. Stiegemeier MJ, Friederichs GJ, et al. Clinical evaluation of a new multi-purpose disinfecting solution in symptomatic contact lens wearers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2006;29(3):143-151.
142. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Barrado-Navascués E, Rubido-Crespo MJ. Ocular surface comfort during the day assessed by instant reporting in different types of contact and non-contact lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens, 2010;36(2):96-100.
143. Choy CK, Cho P, et al. Do multipurpose solutions damage porcine corneal epithelial cells? Optom Vis Sci, 2009;86(5):E447-E453.
144. Cavet ME, VanDerMeid KR, et al. Effect of a novel multipurpose contact lens solution on human corneal epithelial barrier function. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2010;33(Suppl 1):S18-S23.
145. McCanna DJ, Harrington KL, et al. Use of a human corneal epithelial cell line for screening the safety of contact lens care solutions in vitro. Eye Contact Lens, 2008;34(1):6-12. 
146. Tchao R, McCanna DJ, Miller MJ. Comparison of contact lens multipurpose solutions by in vitro sodium fluorescein permeability assay. CLAO J, 2002;28(3):151-156.
147. Pham XT and Huff JW. Cytotoxicity evaluation of multipurpose contact lens solutions using an in vitro test battery. CLAO J, 1999;25(1):28-35.
148. Hall JQ, Paugh JR, et al. A pilot study of the effect of silicone-hydrogel lenses and marketed multipurpose solutions on human epithelial barrier function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2007;48:E-Abstract 5400.
149. Paugh JR, Krall D, et al. The Physiological Consequence of Lens Material and Care Solution Bio-Incompatibilities in Humans. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2009;50:E-abstract 6358.
150. Webb JR, Paugh JR, et al. Clinical and epithelial barrier function evidence of lens material and care solution bio-incompatibilities. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2008;49:E-abstract 2019.
151. Leung T, Tierney WS, et al. Corneal epithelium as a diffusion barrier in human subjects: evidence of changes during overnight sleep. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2009;50:E-abstract 4615.
152. Peterson R, Gorbet M, et al. The transient nature of solution induced corneal staining. Presented at: the American Academy of Optometry Conference; Orlando, FL; 2009.
153. Chuang EY, Li DQ, et al. Effects of contact lens multipurpose solutions on human corneal epithelial survival and barrier function. Eye Contact Lens, 2008;34(5):281-286.
154. Li SL, Ladage PM, et al. Effects of contact lens care solutions on surface exfoliation and bacterial binding to corneal epithelial cells. Eye Contact Lens, 2003;29(1):27-30.
155. Lin M, Truong T, et al. Two-week clinical performance evaluation of soft lenses with channels. Presented at: the American Academy of Optometry Conference; San Diego, CA; 2005.
156. Bantseev V, McCanna DJ, et al. Biocompatibility of contact lens solutions using confocal laser scanning microscopy and the in vitro bovine cornea. Eye Contact Lens, 2007;33(6, Part 1 of 2):308-316.
157. Chang JH, Ren HW, et al. The application of in vivo confocal microscopy and tear LDH measurement in assessing corneal response to contact lens and contact lens solutions. Curr Eye Res, 1999;19(2):171-181.
158. Crawford L, Tran D, et al. Direct cell-contact and agar-overlay in vitro MPS cytotoxicity scores do not correlate to an in vivo sign of MPS cytotoxicity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2009;50:E-abstract 6354.
159. Dutot M, Paillet H, et al. Severe ocular infections with contact lens: role of multipurpose solutions. Eye (Lond), 2009;23(2):470-476.
160. Dutot M, Reveneau E, et al. Multipurpose solutions and contact lens: modulation of cytotoxicity and apoptosis on the ocular surface. Cornea, 2010;29(5):541-549.
161. Gorbet M, Tanti N, et al. Impact of lens material on in vitro cytotoxicity potential of multipurpose solutions on human corneal epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2010;51:E-abstract 3415.
162. Huang LC, Datta K, Lally JM. Effects of contact lens multipurpose solutions on inflammatory cytokine production in human corneal epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2009;50:E-abstract 5627.
163. Lim MJ, Hurst RK, et al. Cytotoxicity testing of multipurpose contact lens solutions using monolayer and stratified cultures of human corneal epithelial cells. Eye Contact Lens, 2009;35(6):287-296.
164. Mowrey-McKee M, Sills A, Wright A. Comparative cytotoxicity potential of soft contact lense care regimens. CLAO J, 2002;28(3):160-164.
165. Oriowo MO. A fluorometric study of relative ocular lens cytosensitivity to multipurpose contact lens solutions using the resazurin assay method. Toxicol In Vitro, 2006;20(8):1548-1554. 
166. Siwale RC, Sills AM, et al. Biocompatability of silicone hydrogel contact lens materials and contact lens care products using in vitro cytotoxicty assays. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2008;49:E-abstract 4863.
167. Imayasu M, Hori Y, Cavanagh HD. Effects of multipurpose contact lens care solutions and their ingredients on membrane-associated mucins of human corneal epithelial cells. Eye Contact Lens, 2010;36(6):361-366.
168. Imayasu M, Shiraishi A, Ohashi Y, Shimada S, Cavanagh HD. Effects of multipurpose solutions on corneal epithelial tight junctions. Eye Contact Lens, 2008;34(1):50-55.
169. Nichols JJ and Sinnott LT. Tear film, contact lens, and patient factors associated with corneal staining. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2011;52(2):1127-1137.